Oakland Community After School Alliance

July 9th, 2010

Berkeley Chief of Police Speaks Out for Afterschool

“Letters to the Editor

BAY AREA NEWS GROUP

Posted: 07/08/2010 10:35:29 AM PDT

Updated: 07/08/2010 10:35:30 AM PDT

Essential programs

Preschool and after-school care are not only important for struggling families, they are also crucial to public safety (“Berkeley schools cut low-income programs,” June 25).

Why does law enforcement care about child care? In the early years, quality preschool prepares kids for academic success and ensures they don’t end up on a path that all too often leads to criminal activity.

Later, after-school programs can cut crime by keeping kids engaged and out of trouble during the hours when juvenile crime peaks. According to a recent report from Fight Crime: Invest in Kids, California’s after-school programs have been linked to improved school-day attendance, increased graduation rates, and reduced crime.

With schools and local governments already forced to make cuts, things could get even worse if proposed state budget cuts take effect. At least 50,000 children could be denied preschool and hundreds of thousands would lose access to after-school care.

As this and future state budgets move forward, access to quality preschool and after-school programs should be a top priority to policy makers and the future governor.

If we don’t take care of youths today, we may end up with more criminals tomorrow.

Michael K. Meehan

Berkeley

Meehan is Berkeley chief of police.

January 29th, 2010

OCASA Concept Paper on Community Schools

“How can the Oakland Fund for Children & Youth (OFCY) best help young people succeed in school; graduate from high school; and not be engaged in violence, crime, and gang-involvement?”

(while staying within its financial capacity and building on the strengths and results of its
After-School Initiative)

The Oakland Community After-School Alliance (OCASA) believes that when schools are accountable for effective classroom instruction, maintaining safe and clean learning environments, and fostering the healthy development of the whole child, more young people will succeed in school; graduate from high school; and be free from a life of violence, crime, and gang-involvement.

OCASA recommends the development of a citywide “Community Schools Initiative” as a core strategy to achieve these outcomes.  Building on the existing after-school infrastructure ensure that a Community School:

1)      values, engages, and supports parents and students as strategic partners in school improvement;

2)      opens its facilities to provide young people high-quality out-of-school time learning; and

3)      facilitates the delivery of integrated family support services to help young people be safe and healthy.

A Community School engages parents, students, teachers, principals, services-providers, and community organizations to work together to transform relationships and resources in favor of serving the interests of young people.

A Community School is a public school that integrates the best educational practices with a wide range of vital in-house health and social services to ensure that children are physically, emotionally and socially prepared to learn. Community schools also strengthen families and communities so they are better able to support student success… A Community School is both a place and a set of partnerships between the school, a lead agency, and other community resources.

In an ideal community school:

  • Before- and after-school programs build on classroom experiences and help students expand their horizons, contribute to their communities and have fun.
  • Family support centers strengthen parent involvement, parent education and leadership development, and provide crisis assistance, child care and housing assistance;
  • Medical, dental and mental health services are readily available
  • Parents and community residents participate in adult education and job training programs.
  • The school sees community as a resource for its curriculum, engages students in active learning and service, and helps them become problem solvers in their communities.
  • The community uses the schools as a center for community problem solving.
  • Volunteers support young people’s academic, interpersonal and career

–From “Overview: Healthy Start and the Community School Approach,”

By Hatchuel Tabernik & Associates

Build on the Existing Afterschool Infrastructure

After-school is an essential bridge between in- and out-of-school time activities. Assuming a strong relationship with the parent and school community, after-school providers should be well situated to serve as a crucial catalyst for community schools. After-school providers’ expertise in developing the whole child and connecting schools with community and families can play a major role in bridging the inside school and outside school components of a child’s life.  After-school is in a central position with students at the interface of in-school academics, academic support, enrichment, parents, behavioral health, health education and preventive health, etc.  By taking a holistic approach, after-school programs have supported children to become more engaged in school, more motivated, and to plan for a positive future.  After-school programs can play an important role in promoting the community school agenda and supporting such efforts on the ground at school sites and with district and community service providers.

OFCY should focus its support of community schools on integrating existing in- and out-of-school time activities at the school site. Prior OFCY investments in after-school, OUSD’s focus on complementary learning, and California’s Healthy Start program provides a foundation at the school site for building a community school.  ASES and OFCY funding has built an infrastructure of after-school programming run by fulltime after-school coordinators at nearly all schools in the district.  OUSD’s complementary learning program has identified community schools as their key strategy moving forward.  By taking a thoughtful approach to integrated funding strategies, OFCY can play a catalytic role in the integration of existing programs that are currently operating in discrete silos at the school site – building on the foundation of its existing after-school programs.

Community Schools – the Foundational Building Blocks

Community schools address the needs of the whole child through four main elements:

1)    Emphasizing Family and the Community Involvement

While schools take different approaches to integrating programs, community engagement (and student power at the high school level) plays a vital role in driving the collaboration between the school, providers and families. The integration of services shouldn’t simply serve the needs of professionals but rather the needs of the students and families they serve.  Community schools fundamentally change how schools are engaged with their communities.  Community schools:

  • Strengthen families and communities so they are better able to support student success
  • Bring parents, faculty, CBOs, public agencies and other partners together to achieve student academic success with mutual accountability for results
  • Ensure that all stakeholders address challenges to student success and take mutual responsibility for achieving results

2)    Accountability to Students, Families and Community

Community Schools typically operate into the evening hours so that they can provide services and supports for parents, families, and community – extended hours respond to the real needs and time constraints that families face and promote maximum accessibility.  After-school providers are already expanding the time that schools are available to serve children, and these are the logical providers to further enhance this extended use of school facilities to serve the larger community.  By linking with after-school and evening programs, specialized service providers, such as health clinics, counseling, dental services, adult education, employment and training, can reach a wider population of students, parents and community.

3)    Integrated Services

Efforts to implement a community schools approach must focus on the integration of in-school and out-of-school time activities.  Increasingly, a variety of services are based at school sites: after-school programs, farmers markets, academic supports, benefit enrollment, health clinics, counseling, and tax preparation and so on.  However, the benefits of this co-location can only be fully realized when school principals and faculty are involved in collaborative formal planning to integrate programming at the school site.  A fully-realized community school is more than a service or set of programs. It is an integrated system whereby all partners operate based on common goals and are purposefully working together as a team to achieve those goals.

4)    The Five Conditions of Learning

The National Coalition for Community Schools has identified Five Conditions of Learning as the core principles of Community Schools. They are:

  1. The school has a core instructional program with qualified teachers, a challenging curriculum, and high standards and expectation for students
  2. Students are motivated and engaged in learning both in school and in community settings, during and after school.
  3. The basic physical, mental and emotional health needs of young people and their families are recognized and addressed.
  4. There is mutual respect and effective collaboration among parents, families and school staff.
  5. Community engagement – together with school efforts – promotes a school climate that is safe, supportive and respectful and connects students to a broader learning community.

There are many ways in which after-school programs enhance the ability of a school to achieve the five conditions of learning – for example, through academic support, connection to the in-school day, high expectations, support for emotional and physical needs, promoting respectful relationships between students, parents, families, and faculty, and supporting a positive school climate.  Often after-school staff are uniquely positioned and qualified to promote these principles because their mandate has greater flexibility – focusing on enrichment, youth development, and parent relationships as well as academic outcomes.


Conclusion

The Community Schools approach in Chicago led to outcomes that map to OFCY’s desired outcomes.

Chicago Community Schools Outcomes

  1. Students in community schools demonstrated an improvement in grades and performance on standardized tests.
  2. They also showed improved performance across several other domains including quality of homework, class participation, and class behavior.
  3. In addition, they consistently demonstrated much lower numbers of serious disciplinary incidents compared to other schools with similar demographics.

-From “Chicago Public Schools: Community Schools Initiative”

OFCY Outcomes

  1. Children and youth succeed in school and graduate from high school
  2. Healthy development of young children
  3. Prevent and reduce violence, crime, and gang involvement among children and youth
  4. Youth transition to productive adulthood

- From OFCY Eligible Services- Section 1301.

OFCY should focus its support of community schools on integrating existing in- and out-of-school time activities at the school site.  Most after-school providers are well situated to serve as the foundation and hub for a community school approach.  Efforts to implement a Community Schools approach must focus on the integration of in-school and out-of-school time activities. Approaching community schools development as simply adding a new program will only result in a dilution of resources and the power of the community schools approach.  Community engagement (and student power at the high school level) plays a vital role in driving the collaborative between the school, providers and families.

October 15th, 2008

Lobbying, Advocacy and Tax Status: Dos and Definite Don’ts



 


Lobbying, Advocacy, and Tax Status: Dos and Definite Don’ts

Please join us on Tuesday, October 28th, for a lobby training overview for board and staff of education and community based organizations, non-governmental agencies, and other nonprofits. We will discuss topics including:

  • What are the lobbying differences between private foundations and other nonprofits?
  • How much can a 501(c)(3) spend each fiscal year on lobbying?
  • What is the difference between direct lobbying and grassroots lobbying?
  • What election-related activities may a 501(c)(3) organization engage in?
  • What state laws apply to nonprofits working on ballot measures and state-level lobbying?

RSVP to educationinfo@sff.org or call Krishen Laetsch at 415.733.8515 for questions.

Directions:
Enter City Hall from 14th Street between Clay and Broadway – and turn left.

Public Transportation:
Oakland City Hall is convenient is easily accessible by BART (12th Street Stations and by several bus lines (www.actransit.org).

Parking:
There are four parking structures near Oakland City Hall:

  • Less than 100 yards away: The parking structure located on Clay between 14th Street and 16th Street, behind City Hall and just across the plaza from the EBCF. Closes at 11 p.m. The parking lot beneath the Dalziel Building close to the De Domenico Building; the entrance to this garage is on 16th Street between Clay and Telegraph.
  • One block away: The Rotunda Garage is the closest parking structure with entrances from 16th and 17th Streets between San Pablo and Telegraph. The pay point for this garage is on San Pablo between 16th and 17th Streets; pay before retrieving your car and exiting.
  • Two blocks away: City Center Garage, located beneath City Center, accessed via entrances on 14th Street between 1300 Clay Street and 505 14th Street buildings, or via 11th Street just past Clay Street.
  • Three blocks away: City Center Garage West, which is located on the corner of 12th Street and Jefferson Street, and accessed via entrances on 12th Street and Martin Luther King, Jr. Way (across from Preservation Park).


October 2008

More Details

WHAT:
Lobbying, Advocacy and Tax Status: Dos and Definite Don’ts

WHEN:
October 28, 2008
Breakfast: 8:30 a.m.
Program: 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m.

WHERE:
Oakland City Hall
One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Oakland
Ground Floor, Hearing Room 3

RSVP:
Email educationinfo@sff.org
 

 

 


Click here to unsubscribe.
Click here to forward this email to a friend.


THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION
225 Bush Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104
415.733.8500 | info@sff.org | www.sff.org

July 8th, 2008

POSTPONED: OCASA MEMBER MEETING

Hello OCASA Community,
The Steering Committee has decided to postpone the member meeting until early September to further develop action items for your consideration at the meeting.  Please keep an eye out for future save the dates.

Thanks!

Liz

Hello OCASA Community!Please plan on attending (and bringing 2-3 others from your
organization) the OCASA member meeting on Tuesday, August 19th. The
meeting will be held at the First Unitarian Church of Oakland, 685 14th
St, Oakland, CA 94612 from 9AM to noon.

We will have a panel on the changing landscape of afterschool in Oakland
and will discuss how we would like to influence the institutions that
shape the landscape.

We will send out a formal invitation in the coming weeks.
Thank you,

Liz Johnson
Program Associate
Urban Strategies Council
510 893 1377
lizj at urbanstrategies.org

June 10th, 2008

Oakland Tribune: Kids First! group says it has signatures needed for November ballot measure

Kids First! group says it has signatures needed for November ballot measure

Kelly Rayburn
Oakland Tribune STAFF WRITER

By Kelly Rayburn

OAKLAND — A group called the Oakland Kids First! Coalition turned in nearly 45,000 signatures to the city clerk’s office Monday, aiming to place a ballot measure before voters in November to dramatically increase youth services.

Measure proponents say it would “protect and expand” the services initially provided under Measure K, approved in 1996. But the proposed 2008 measure, known as Kids First! Two, has drawn opposition from Mayor Ron Dellums and some members of the City Council.

The coalition needs about 18,900 valid signatures to force a ballot question. And while they could face a tough fight come November, about 75 teenagers and youth program leaders celebrated what they’d already accomplished.

Kim Miyoshi, executive director of Oakland Kids First, just one of the nonprofit organizations that falls under the umbrella of the Oakland Kids First! Coalition, said the campaign was “like the little engine that could.”

“All the challenges seemed somewhat insurmountable,” she said. “It seemed like the City Council wasn’t for it, … and yet every time we hit a roadblock almost a miracle would happen and more people would get on board.”

Measure K mandates that 2.5 percent of the city’s unrestricted general fund revenue be set aside in the Oakland Children’s Fund for youth programs. The new initiative would nearly double funding for the Children’s Fund starting in 2011 by mandating that 2.5 percent of all city revenue go toward the fund. The city’s yearly general fund is about $475 million while its total revenue is close to $1 billion.Groups that receive funding include Oakland Kids First, the East Bay Asian Youth Center, Girls Inc. of Alameda County, Youth ALIVE! and Youth UpRising.

Mayor Ron Dellums said in a statement the “proposal pursues a laudable objective that I support.” But he continued that, “by increasing expenditures and not increasing revenues, this measure would reduce budgets for other crucial city services including many services that support Oakland kids.” The mayor said he remained committed to working with outside government and private funding sources to benefit nonprofit organizations such as those funded by Measure K.

City Councilmember Jean Quan (Montclair-Laurel), the head of the council’s finance committee, reiterated her opposition to the measure. She noted that the council extended the original set-aside provided by Measure K through 2021, but said increasing that percentage further could mean deep cuts to other city services, such as parks and recreation and senior programs.

Initiative proponents said youth programs are more important than ever, with crime rates high.

“I think in neighborhoods all across the city that residents and families want Oakland to be a place where they can raise their children in a safe and nurturing environment,” said David Kakishiba, executive director of the East Bay Asian Youth Center. “And it think the Kids First! initiative would go a long way to making that happen.”

Reach Kelly Rayburn at 510-208-6435 or krayburn@bayareanewsgroup.com.

June 3rd, 2008

SB 1674 passes Appropriations Committee

(From the  CalSAC May Newsletter)

Senate Bill 1674 (SB 1674 – Torlakson), was released from the Suspense File and passed the Senate Appropriations Committee. The provision within the bill as it was originally written to establish a minimum grant award for small schools was deleted due to perceived cost pressures, in order to move the other provisions forward.

If passed, the bill will continue to establish the California After-School Teacher Pipeline Pilot Program, ensure that sub-contractors/ sub-providers of ASES and 21st CCLC programs receive a reasonable grant allotment for administrative functions, and allow ASES programs to operate on weekends with students who attend the after school program on regular school days (and without counting weekend activities toward program attendance).  This bill should go to a full floor vote this week.

For more information about this bill, click here.

April 24th, 2008

April 30th OUSD Rally Against Governor’s Budget

Dear Friends of Oakland Public Schools . . .

Please attend the April 30th Rally to oppose the Governor’s $5 Billion cut to California’s public schools.

The impact to Oakland Unified School District is $23 million – - equivalent to 300+ teachers.

Hear parents, teachers, and students explain how these cuts will directly affect our schools!!!

Learn about concrete steps you and I can take to get our voice heard in Sacramento!!!

Oakland Public Schools

An investment we can’t afford to cut.

RALLY TO OPPOSE

 

GOVERNOR’S $5

 

BILLION

CUT TO EDUCATION

April 30, 2008 at 4PM

1025 2nd Avenue, Hunter Hall

Please join the Board of Education, the State Administrator, educators, parents, students, members of the business and faith communities, legislative, labor and city leaders, citizens of Oakland…ALL ARE WELCOME!

· Take action to oppose the cuts to education and reach out to neighbors throughout California to encourage them to join us in the fight to preserve public schools.

· Bring your address books and contact lists!

· Hear from students and district employees from across the city about the impact of the proposed cuts.

· Bring neighbors and colleagues to participate in the rally on April 30.

The Oakland community is standing together to preserve and increase the resources available to Oakland Public Schools.

By The Numbers…

q The state has proposed cutting school funding by $4.8 billion by the end of the 2008-09 school year

q OUSD would have to cut $23 million from the budget for the 2008-09 school year

q A $4.8 billion budget cut would reduce spending by $800 per student

q CA currently – without the budget cut – spends $1,900 less per student than the national average

q California ranks 46th in education funding, behind states such as Louisiana and Mississippi

More information: www.ousd.k12.ca.us

Hosted by the Oakland Board of Education and co-sponsored by the Honorable Barbara Lee, the Honorable Don Perata, the Honorable Sandre Swanson, the Honorable Loni Hancock, Sheila Jordan, Superintendent, Alameda County of Education, and the Oakland Education Association.

March 25th, 2008

Senate Bill to Limit Release of ASES Funding

California Afterschool Network Policy Update

Important Policy Information
The California Afterschool Network Policy Committee has requested that the Network share this important and relevant after school policy information with the field.

SB 1492 (Mcclintock): Proposed New After School Legislation
If passed, After School Education and Safety (ASES) program funding would only be released in years which the previous fiscal year ends with at least a 3% surplus and it is projected by the Department of Finance and Legislative Analyst’s Office that in the two following fiscal years, General Fund revenues will exceed General Fund expenditures. Seeks to give the Legislature authority to set the annual funding level of the ASES program by repealing the portion of proposition 49 that requires voter approval to lower ASES funding.

Under the current law it would require a ballot initiative to implement SB 1492.
The measure proposes a new ballot initiative that would for all practical
purposes repeal Proposition 49, putting an end to guaranteed state funding for after-school programs serving hundreds of thousands of students. To view the text of this bill as it was introduced, click here.

On April 2, 2008 SB 1492 (Mcclintock) will go before the Senate Education Committee.
Individuals who wish to effectively comment on this bill should send letters and comments prior to April 1, 2008. To view a letter drafted by Lindsay Callahan of the Central Valley After School Foundation opposing this bill addressed to Senator Jack Scott, chair of the Senate Education Committee, click here.

View a Children Now analysis of this bill.

To locate more contact information for members of the Senate Education Committee including Senator Jack Scott, Chair of the Committee click here. To locate your State Senator, click here www.sen.ca.gov.

SB 1674 (Torlakson): Proposed New After School Legislation
If passed this bill will expand opportunities for after school program
staff to access the existing Paraprofessional Teacher Training Program;
clarify that ASES grantees using supplemental grants may use grant funds
to operate and track attendance and expenses on weekends in addition to
intercession, summer, and vacation periods; set a minimum grant amount
for small schools with 60 students or less with 2/3 of the students
attending the after school program in order to ensure that small
programs receive enough grant funding to employ the staff necessary to
run the program; and ensure that subcontractors of ASES grantees receive
a reasonable amount of administrative funds to administer after school
programs.

To view the text of this bill as it was introduced, click here.

Individuals may comment on this bill. To view a fact sheet and letter of support for SB 1674 drafted by Jennifer Peck, Executive Director of the Bay Area Partnership for Children and Youth and Co-Chair of the Network Policy Committee addressed to Jack Scott, chair of the Senate Education Committee, click here.

To locate more contact information for members of the Senate Education Committee including Senator Jack Scott, Chair of the Committee click here. To locate your State Senator, click here.

March 17th, 2008

OUSD Budget Crisis Staffing Implications Briefing Note

As our partners – I share this with you. These are painful budget times. The crisis kit attached offers ways for people to let their feelings be known in Sacramento. The briefing offers how we as a district are handling the crisis internally.

Best, Kirsten

Kirsten M. Vital
Chief of Community Accountability
Oakland Unified School District
510-879-8166 (work)
510-879-8800 (fax)
Kirsten.Vital@ousd.k12.ca.us
Expect Success: Every classroom. Every student. Every day.

Espere éxito: Cada aula, cada alumno, cada día


From: Troy Flint
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 3:39 PM
To: Executive Team; Strategy Team; All Site Administrators List
Cc: troy.flint@ousd.k12.ca.us
Subject: Budget Crisis Staffing Implications Briefing Note

Hello All,

It’s no secret that the $5 billion reduction in education funding proposed by Governor Schwarzenegger is a frightening prospect for California’s schools. As you surely recognize, the cuts have very real and severe consequences, not only for the state’s schoolchildren but also for the adults who work to provide them with essential educational opportunities.

In order to meet the Governor’s demands, many school districts have issued preliminary layoff notices and announced dramatic reductions in student programs. These decisions have prompted considerable anxiety both in Oakland and across the state. We write now to provide some clarity on how Oakland Unified intends to address the fiscal crisis. Please refer to the enclosed briefing note in discussing the staffing implications of the state budget shortfall and our coordinated opposition to proposals that balance the budget on the backs of California’s school children and school district employees.

Naturally, a question involving so many lives will not be resolved with a single document and we expect to field questions on the staffing issue from all corners of OUSD. The budget crisis situation is fluid in many respects and some of the details regarding our response will become plain only as events unfold here and in Sacramento. In the meantime, we will provide the facts as we know them and work closely with the broader OUSD community to offer the answers they seek.

In closing, we would like to thank you for your strength and cooperation during this most difficult time. The caliber of leadership in Oakland Unified gives me no small confidence that we will emerge from this trial prepared to continue the critical work of accelerating student achievement. Again, if you have further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best,

Troy

P.S. Please note that the budget crisis toolkit is available in English, Spanish and Chinese on the homepage of the OUSD website.
final-budget-crisis-staffing-implications-briefing-note.pdf

budget-crisis-kit-single-file.pdf

Troy Flint

Spokesperson

Oakland Unified School District

1025 Second Avenue

Oakland, CA 94606

510.879.8242 (w)

510.206.3737 (m)

510.879.1834 (f)

Expect Success: Every Student. Every Classroom. Every Day.

March 10th, 2008

Save the Date: Tuesday, May 20: The Afterschool Challenge

The Afterschool Challenge is Coming.

Save the Date: Tuesday, May 20

The Fourth Annual California Afterschool Challenge is coming Tuesday, May 20. All afterschool professionals and older youth who are served by programs or came up through programs are invited to attend!

Please visit the Afterschool Challenge webpage to learn more about this advocacy day and to use our new and improved online registration. Alternatively, you may send in the registration form via email (mmangan@calsac.org) or fax (415) 957-9776.Don’t forget, registration for this event ends May 1.

Some of the exciting things to remember for this year’s Challenge:

· This is a tight year with the state’s budget cuts, so it’s very important that we all link arms to tell legislators not to cuts funds for California’s children and youth, including afterschool programs.

· We want youth who are affected by afterschool programs to have a voice this year, so please register older youth in your programs or young staff who came up through after school programs to speak about how their afterschool programs have benefitted them.

Join us and help get the word out. Tell your partners and associates to come to Sacramento Tuesday, May 20. For more information, call (415) 957-9775 or info@calsac.org.

Contact CalSAC:
California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC)
657 Mission Street, Suite 601
San Francisco, CA 94105

Ph: (415) 957-9775
Fax: (415) 957-9776

info@calsac.org
http://www.calsac.org/

|